Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and
paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not
addressed by mainstream science."
The significance of prescience during the history in people’s life style is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellations of perspectives, some may content that fiction prioritizes than reality in contributing the persons to obviate their challenges in which the science cannot provide the reasonable justification. Conversely, others persevere in unraveling the notion that the anticipation the future based on nonscientific provenance does not have any place. After weighing these both sides, each of them can be plausible to some extent.
To inaugurate, consider first the respect people are more inclined toward the idea of endorsing the psychic pursuits. Going into the depth, having had insufficient information to resolve some predicament issues, some individuals, especially, the ones possessing nugatory and restricted information may be more partial to advocate this belief to surmount their problems. Indeed, the less the data and valid information derived from savant, the more the susceptibility of penchant of ordinary persons to pursue the fictions and nonmainstream ideas. To shed more light, the role of further expand knowledge to unearth better and logical solutions for answering the questions of persons is completely sensed.
Another reason which is of equal importance if not more is the fiction is intertwined with the traditions and rituals of humans from the beginnings of their lives. To put in general words, if the humans have been drift apart from their misbelief emanated from their ancestors and progenitors, they would have become aware from the inauthenticity of these types of belief and they would have made their strength to abandon them. As it is all transparent, seldom do the persons allegiance to their predecessors opt for the accurate and true way in their lives. Because, the majority of these notions do not own profound roots propelling the persons toward catastrophic conditions. Thus, here the role of tradition and culture in gravitating the illiterate persons toward the astrology to anticipate their future.
To converge on the belief of the latter group, investigation all trust worth origin of each issue can be scrutinized aptly. To delineate, only when one does not embrace each dimension of issues, before perusing it meticulously, can it expected that one can have a chance to reach a pinnacle of accomplishments in making a decision . Based on one scientific research conducted in the psychological province, the better the persons looks all avenues and windows of aspects of life, the less the prevalence of inclination of persons to follow the reverie belief to actualize their desires.
Another outlook demystifying the latter hypothesis is contributing the persons to pursue their real aspirations in order not to become despondent. To clarify, despairing the persons may come from paying attention to the astrology which predicts the palatable future, but in real the persons cannot observe it. Accordingly, he will become disappointed and raze his life for good. Hence, the importance of awareness the persons about this belief not to lag behind in their lives seems essential.
Drawing upon the enumerated the reasons, in spite of subsisting some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, the benefits of vindicating the scientific origin from all issue in lieu of selecting the fiction belief are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only can the valid information enlighten the people’s lives about the realism and accurate phenomena, but also, the individuals may be predisposed to a surge of truth helping them to distinguish right from wrong before the issue can leave destructive influences on their lives.
(584words)
- The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant eventsand trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of peoplewhose identities have long been forgotten. 16
- about the musicians from the past and the present 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 88
- Is it better to spend the money of rich persons for health care? 90
- Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...As it is all transparent, seldom do the persons allegiance to their predecessors opt fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 559, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e accurate and true way in their lives. Because, the majority of these notions do not o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... of accomplishments in making a decision . Based on one scientific research conduc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, hence, if, look, may, so, then, thus, apart from, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3169.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43567753002 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04645521146 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516295025729 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1001.7 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1653332774 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.045454545 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0281989676774 0.243740707755 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00981772907056 0.0831039109588 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.013555160642 0.0758088955206 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0147636251191 0.150359130593 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127919234594 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 182.0 100.480337079 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.