Teaching is considered as one of the most difficult job. Teaching a person rather than getting taught by someone, both are different aspects. Teachers are entitled as second parents of a student in India. But that does not mean that teachers will not be provided sufficient amount of salary at the end of the month. I do agree with the claim that teachers should be provided with salaries based on the student academic performance.
Firstly there exists different types of students in a school, some are good in studies and some have worst academic skills. Students possesing worst academic skills does not mean that they should be discriminated on the basis of their studying capabilities. These students who are not good in understanding skills need extra support from the teachers, so that they can also score well in their academic life. But as a teacher point of view, a teacher always put maximum effort so that a student can participate among rest of the studnets who are doing well in their academics. Teachers who put extra efforts for those weak students should be provided with the salary on the basis of time and effort devoted by them on the student throughout the month.
Secondly every teacher do their jobs because they also have a family behind their back. They also have to look after them and give them a nurutious life. Getting a salary based on their monthly efforts in their teaching line will bring motivated throughout the year. Teachers do have their own expenses and also need to bear every second responsibilty of their family.
If they will be not provided with fair salary, it will be a injustice to their sincerity and efforts for those weak students.
Thirdly as we all know that if a person will be provided with justified salary, he/she will always take more interest their work field. Same will happen in the case of teaching proffession. If a teacher will recieve more salary than a teacher who is not teaching with utmost sincerity and class result is not up to the mark, whereas he/she is teaching very sincerely, also class result is very good. This will provide the teachers a feeling of justification to their salary.
Providing salary on the basis of a student academic performance can might be a bad step too because some teachers can get extra salary by pulling up some strings in the treasury department but that does not mean rulling out this essential step in the teaching field. Students should be divided into different sections on the basis of their teaching needs and requirements. Teachers who are fit to a particular section should be appointed and then teachers' salary can be given on the basis of their students' academic performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the worst'.
Suggestion: have the worst
...hool, some are good in studies and some have worst academic skills. Students possesing wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'possesing the worst'.
Suggestion: possesing the worst
...me have worst academic skills. Students possesing worst academic skills does not mean that they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t provided with fair salary, it will be a injustice to their sincerity and effort...
^
Line 10, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ar section should be appointed and then teachers salary can be given on the basis of the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8590021692 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53994397565 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420824295011 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9656544536 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268709846667 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980047969412 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801322557408 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161565692291 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635974070287 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.