There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts – especially at a great cost in money and jobs – to save endangered animal or plant species.
World was beautiful and peaceful place. There were thousands of animals and plant species groom on this planet and made it beautiful. Plants made environment healthy. Then a creature called "HUMAN BEING" started revolution with most powerful weapon called "Brain". For their greedy purposes, they started to pollute environment. They destroyed many forest and killed many animals to fullfill their needs. Now many animals and plant species are very less alive on Earth. We humna being destroy and killed them, so now we have to take some bold steps to save them.
We destroyed nature too much that to save it, we need to put extra efforts in turms of cost. Because to save many animal species, we need technological research and advancement. This can be costly. Humans are earning from products which are made with animal organs. We need to stop hunting to save animals. This can be harmful for many country's economy. Specially for that countries whose economy is dependent on these types of animal products. For example, Japan. Japan earns money by selling fish oil. Because of too much hunting of whales, now many species of whale fish is no more in Earth. Stop in hunting will reduce this income that can cost Japan economy.
We destroyed forest for land. Human population increased too much, now we do not have enough land for houses, industries etc. So we destroyed forest. Now we have to reconstruct forest. For that we need land in cost of houses and industries. Many industries polluting environment. For some industry we does not have advance technology to stop it. We do not have technology to reduce pollution because of coal in power stations. So we have to close those industries. This can lead to unemployment and we have to lost jobs.
So, this can be costly for us in terms of money and job. This can be burden on economy also. But to make ourplanet pollution free and healthy to live, we have to put efforts. There can be other solutions of these problems. For example, there are some other methods to produce electricity like water dams. This can be pollution free solution. We can find alternative products to the animal products like leather products.
In conclusion, we have to sacrifice some things to save animals and plants species. But we have destroyed it. So, cost for this is worthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | smituparmar | 50 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 62
- Membership in Oak City’s Civic Club – a club whose primary objective is to discuss local business – should continue to be restricted to people who live in Oak city. People who work in Oak city but who live elsewhere cannot truly understand the busin 69
- The following appeared in the annual report from the president of national brush company.“In order to save money, we at the National Brush Company have decided to pay our employees for each brush they produce instead of for time they spend producing bru 63
- The following appeared as part of the business plan of an investment and financial consulting firm.“Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker’s consumption of coffee increases with age, from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consum 63
- "The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun forest seems to be countable; consider using: 'many forests'.
Suggestion: many forests
... to pollute environment. They destroyed many forest and killed many animals to fullfill the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...uting environment. For some industry we does not have advance technology to stop it....
^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... and job. This can be burden on economy also. But to make ourplanet pollution free a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90428211587 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60722446776 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486146095718 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 39.0 20.2370786517 193% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 23.0359550562 43% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7275207792 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 49.9230769231 118.986275619 42% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.1794871795 23.4991977007 43% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.30769230769 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151836857054 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455023497994 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479403768814 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108642562489 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466908716454 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 14.1392134831 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 48.8420337079 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 12.1743820225 49% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.66 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 11.2143820225 54% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.7820224719 51% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.