I partly disagree with this statement.
A politician should have a special bottom line in morality. After all, a political decision could not have personal emotional and there is no problem. Even if the person might affect his judgment. The government can get more powerful.
First of all, politics is a communication base in profits. When he leaves the profit, his morality might make bore others. But this is a narrow definition of morality.
An overly narrow definition of morality might point for complete forthrightness and there's something here that limits his behavior called law. A president's actions are limited by the vice president and Congress, etc. Of course, he should have a bottom line, or he is another Hitler. He should know he should kill any common people.
Secondly, morality also has some complication understanding. It is the wrong thing in moral behavior in politics such as a deal with another country. If he agrees on a certain treaty and he should do it. When he cannot do it and other countries will not trust it. This is a basic line in morality. As a president, when he spoke of his ideal when he ran for election, he would try to realize it. If he is involved in a moral scandal, he may step down from his political platform. Some presidents in history have experienced things like this. So he should be very careful. Those things may make people distrust him. A politician serves this country, and what he does should be good for his country. This is one of the moral principles. But a politician can't suffer because of his personal feelings, so a politician needs a limited moral principle.
To sum up, Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms have some reasonable, but there are more mistakes.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I partly disagree with this statement. A politician should have a special botto...
^^^
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onal emotional and there is no problem. Even if the person might affect his judgment. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...t point for complete forthrightness and theres something here that limits his behavior...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the moral principles. But a politician cant suffer because of his personal feelings...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, after all, of course, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79016393443 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72814468971 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2985045158 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.1923076923 118.986275619 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7307692308 23.4991977007 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150660686129 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044010672538 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911387326305 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107766141248 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159865944253 0.0667264976115 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 14.1392134831 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.32 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.