To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
It is said that studying the major cities of a society is one way to understand the most important characteristics of it. I agree with this statement to some extent.
One the one hand, big cities in each society can be a representative of it. Most societies are recognized by the special features of their cities. For example, in my country, Iran has a reputation for some of its cities such as Isfahan, Tehran, Shiraz, and Mashhad. Isfahan and Shiraz are representative of historical cities in Iran. Both of them have a long ancient background which brings honor to the Iranian people. Tehran is the capital of Iran and is famous as one of the important industrial cities in Iran, and most political activities are done in this city. Mashhad is a sign of religious cities, and it is famous for its Imam Reza mosque. But the question is whether the features of big cities can be enough for recognizing societies. Certainly, the answer is no.
On the other hand, there are other important factors which should be considered alongside the features of big cities. Some factors such as the health and education systems of the city as well as the economic and social situation of it. Has the country well-funded health and education systems? Do people have a high level of health provisions? How many numbers of people can have access to educational facilities? Has the country a good economic situation in the world compared to other countries? Do women have equal rights compared to men in their country? All these questions help us to understand the features of a society. For example, the USA is a powerful country in terms of its economic situation, and it is considered a happy country in which all men and women have equal rights in different situations. By contrast, Africa is a poor country, and most people around the world know that people in this country suffer from poverty. The majority of people know these countries based on the economic and social situations not based on the features of their big cities.
To summarize, in my view, for understanding the most important characteristics of a society, we have to check the economic and social situations of it and the study of its major cities should be done alongside them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 63
- Progress should be the aim of any great society people too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown 60
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 50
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7984496124 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78843577586 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434108527132 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4311663635 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7391304348 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8260869565 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280173320649 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796925328573 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125064714081 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249068894069 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128279676878 0.0667264976115 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.