To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker asserts that best way to understand the most important feature of a society is to research its major cities. I fundamentally agree; however, it is important not to overstate the importance of research major city in understanding characteristics of a society.
In many cases, major city represents the characteristics of country. Major cities lead the trend of business or economy and even technology in their society. For example, New York City leads the economy and business of U.S.A. Moreover, cities in Silicon Valley are pioneers of technology innovation. Thus, if someone want to understand economy, business and technology of U.S.A, one can study these major cities representing characteristic of a society. Yet, the research of major city can help understanding feature of a community but there’s some limits in this way.
First, major city can be the small part of the society. Major cities are not necessarily representing the characteristic of whole society. Thus, the characteristic of major city might be only intrinsic phenomena of local community. For instance, Pyongyang is a major city of North Korea. In Pyongyang, most people enjoy their life because most of them are upper class. However, in other cities in North Korea, many people are poor and starve, so they are unhappy. Research of Pyongyang will not give any clue to understand North Korea.
Second, the characteristic of the city was formed effected by both characteristic of society and characteristic of local community. Thus, it is difficult to distinguish what is the characteristic of a society with the research of major city. Of course, research of major cities can give you a characteristic of a society. Yet, it is not necessarily important feature of society. It can be only trivial feature of a community.
In sum, to understand the characteristic of a society, research of major city has important roll, but for further understanding relationship between major cities and whole society must be thoroughly considered.
- Movies and television have negative effects on young people. 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 50
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Movies and television have negative effects on young people. 70
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...technology innovation. Thus, if someone want to understand economy, business and tec...
^^^^
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...economy, business and technology of U.S.A, one can study these major cities repre...
^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to understand' or 'understand'.
Suggestion: to understand; understand
...et, the research of major city can help understanding feature of a community but there's...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, as for, for example, for instance, of course, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2786377709 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25974877877 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427244582043 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6016009537 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.25 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200828286936 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803184014378 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555401500873 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145184028636 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396643429646 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.