At face value, the statement that people should take a close look at the major cities of a country in order to gain insightful knowledge about the peculiar characteristics of that country seems persuasive and reasonable. After all, big cities represent most aspects of the custom and culture of the nation and count for a major component in society study. Nevertheless, the argument neglects the reality that with the widespread international communication and mutual interaction, many major cities have lost their uniqueness and become more comprehensive, and thus study of major cities cannot be considered general standard or the only approach to investigate a society.
Admittedly, many years before, when world’s population was far less than now and people in different countries began to gather in bigger and lager groups and consequently formed the major cities, it was true that those places became the representatives of the community or nation. And without question, one should and must investigate these cities to gain understanding of that society’s characteristics. For instance, Beijing has been the core of cultural study of China since over 100 years ago and is now still attracting people from all over the world to observe its appearance and history. And when the United States is mentioned, New York city will be the first place to pop up in mind and travelers will set New York as their first destination when they plan to visit USA.
Notwithstanding the fact listed above, people should caution the trap in big cities’ cultural investigation. With the development and advance of technology and the overall society, now the earth becomes more like a global village and the major cities in a certain country become the habitats of people from all over the world. Take Shanghai in China for example, international citizens play a significant role in its function and even turn into the character of the cosmopolitan itself. When the custom and culture is talked about, one will find it difficult to single out Chinese characteristics from other cultures and confused by the integration of international culture. No origin of a certain place can be easily distinguished and the multi-culture merge evolves into its own complexity and fruition. Thus, many cosmopolitans including Shanghai have lost the original flavors and thus cannot be adopted as the measure of the whole nation’s characteristics.
To conclude, big cities of a nation are good sources of investigation of that nation’s characteristics. But this approach should not be considered the only way.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 90
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 70
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for perso 80
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 414 350
No. of Characters: 2129 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.511 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.143 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.016 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.638 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5