Not only in modern age, an appealing image has always been attracting public since antiquity. When we meet a person the first time, it is his appealing image that attracts us more than anything else. Only after few conversations, we start peeling off the outer appearance, and look inside; what is hidden beneath that mask. So we need an appealing image if we want to draw some attention. Because only after you have someone's attention, they will listen to you, and then you can show who you really are. For example,?? If you are a magician, and you are performing. First, you need the attention of people and then afterward you show your real talent to them. Imagine, if a magician doesn't have the veritas(??) to attract people, then who will see his magic?. So creating an appeal always helps in creating an atmosphere, which helps the person in getting most out of his work.
Problem is, when there is nothing else but appeal. And such are the cases that have brought bad reputation to this whole mechanism of publicity and building an image. What happens is, when people are attracted towards you based on your image and do not find anything special or remarkable in you, they generate a negative tendency towards all such people who have that kind of initial appeal to them. So it is not the image itself which is a problem but the actual person who is using it inappropriately. An example is: A pop song artist who is much publicized in media because of his image doesn't actually live up to it and falls tragically after few hits.
It is true that by following an easy path of initial publicity, popularity, and image building, people do get benefitted for short term, but for the long run, you have to be genuinely good to take full benefit of it. Sooner or later people will know whether you are fooling them or not.
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your r 50
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ?
...can show who you really are. For example,?? If you are a magician, and you are per...
^^
Line 1, column 684, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... talent to them. Imagine, if a magician doesnt have the veritas?? to attract people, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 710, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...if a magician doesnt have the veritas?? to attract people, then who will see his m...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erson in getting most out of his work. Problem is, when there is nothing else b...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ublicized in media because of his image doesnt actually live up to it and falls tragic...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, really, so, then, for example, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59327217125 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46206809644 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556574923547 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6259831374 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3529411765 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236049202606 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742532039958 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551259837846 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151746604461 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609049521328 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.