Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea

Our civilization has become modernized in the past few centuries. Humans tend to pay more attention to their individual growth. In today’s society, one of the many ways to express individualism is through polishing the personal images. A personal image perhaps could be interpreted as personal branding, plays an influential role in modern society. In the age of social media, people pay excessive attention to their online presence, crafting their personal images toward perfection, to build up a wonderful first impression. The proposed statement suggests that it is unfortunate creating such images becomes more important than the truth behind the image- our humanities and personal values. While I agree with the author of this statement that sometimes people might overemphasize their appearance and ignore their inner growth, there are some beneficial effects of building your personal brand images that we should not ignore.
Crafting one’s personal image could mean that a person is paying attention to their social appearance. There are many ways to practice self-care coming out of this argument, such as dressing up oneself and posting positive online status on social media. Pursuing these activities does not mean that they are more important than the reality behind the image. The notion of reality could mean differently to individuals who come from different backgrounds.
Creating an appealing image requires one to put in more effort into their social presence. With the development of social media, people tend to build virtual connections first before they meet in person. This could mean networking, job searching, and finding social interest groups. Under such a situation, it is important and even crucial for people to have a shining personal image online. It is argued that people with better online and social profiles are likely to acquire more opportunities in reality due to the impact of having a positive first impression. For example, recruiters tend to seek for potential job candidates with qualified resumes and social media accounts before sending out interview invitations.
While we should keep up our footsteps with the importance of building an appealing personal image to others, it is suggested that paying equal attention to keep up with the quality of the truth behind that image presented. The truth behind that image perhaps could be explained as the depth of one’s knowledge and skills. These qualities are what decide how long of the journey a person can walk. These characteristics have more impact on someone’s career path. Therefore, our personal growth in contemporary society is not any less than our social presence. A handful of sociology research has suggested that reading books and pursuing education can nourish our bodies and minds.
In sum, some might argue that people’s attention to building personal images might overshadow the truth and characteristics behind these images, I would say that it is imprudent to draw such a conclusion and apply it to the entire population. Perhaps what is best is that we should spend equal time and effort to build both external and internal value.

Votes
Average: 8 (5 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35928143713 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80846196622 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483033932136 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3392793093 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.04 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.12 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210012214887 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658128880798 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632210376891 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123669675667 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425507293129 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.