Universities are places that molds a student in a way to cope up in the particular field of study. In other words, they are the realms where a student shapes and develops himself with education and all the skill sets pertaining to their field of interest. The prompt recommends that every students should be obliged by Universities to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. I mostly disagree with the claim and argue that students should not be obliged to take variety of courses and rather students should be urged to take courses of their interest.
Firstly, every student are built different and they have their own particualr field of interest. Students can perform with alacrity and zeal when they remain in the realm of their interest. For instance: A group of professors and students have developed and programming tool 'R', which was possible with equal contributions of the individuals of group. Students also could contribute to the project as they had interest in programming. Had those students compelled by University to take courses of music, dance or sports, they would not be able to contribute to the project. Even if they contributed it would not be to the extent of former case.
Secondly, Although the primary reason for attending university is education, students have different plans, aspirations, and goals after their degree. There a multiple carrer options after University education, some student dream of being researcher, some enterprenuer, some sportsperson etc. For instance: some students in US get admitted to university with sole aim to get into National Basketball Association (NBA). They are attend university just to receive passing grade which they obtain with little effort. They concentrate on basketball solely with unterminated focus to enter into NBA. Such students, if required by universities to take different courses, will lose their focus and cannot work on developing their game.
Thirdly, Concentration on a particular field of interest can make a individual connoisseur in that particular field, but in some cases holistic approach is required to solve real time issues. In other words, copius amount of knowledge in a particular field sometimes is not sufficient enough to get rid of pragmatic problems. For instance: we are already acquainted about the hot topic of this century 'climate change' and several research activities are being conducted to alleviate the problems engendered by climate change. These research activities have been done by holistic approach; collaboration of the specialists from different sectors like environment, agriculture, forestry, water resource specialists etc. Had the universities not acquainted about climate change to its students from different backgrounds it would be a bit difficult to begin the research and draw relevant conclusions.
In conclusion, there are some benefits offered to the students by university obliging students to take a variety of courses outside of their field of study, but the merits put forth by encouraging students to focus in their field of interest outweighs the former. Rather than requiring every student to take variety of courses university should put forth the choices by which students can take courses pertaining to their field of study.
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 62
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t be able to contribute to the project. Even if they contributed it would not be to the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the extent of former case. Secondly, Although the primary reason for attendin...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'attended'.
Suggestion: attended
...al Basketball Association NBA. They are attend university just to receive passing grad...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk on developing their game. Thirdly, Concentration on a particular field of i...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a particular field of interest can make a individual connoisseur in that particul...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2780.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89413557216 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463461538462 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0924935148 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.869565217 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6086956522 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481348996823 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158995344465 0.0831039109588 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173365489393 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321111441271 0.150359130593 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204488672036 0.0667264976115 306% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.