Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
The author in the given issue states that universities must require every student should go for a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. I comply with the authors statement because taking part in various activities helps student to realize their inherent talent for a particular activity and it is beneficial for him. There are many reasons, based on which I accede with the author's statement and I will comprehend the reasons in the succeeding statements.
Firstly, every university is a base for academics and very few universities have different field of activities for the students. It is essential for a student to go for the courses he is fond of, as it enhances his talent in that particular field. For example, a person having good reflexes, can become a good sportsman, a person having a grand way of acting can undoubtedly join the field of cinema, etc. Considering these examples, it is evident that taking part into variety of course can enhance the inherent talent of a person and can be beneficial in future.
Secondly, adhering to extra curriculum activities expose a person to new things and one can learn from it. The students, frustrated from academics, can give try to variety of activities like yoga to appease their mind and make them mentally strong. Indulging in activities related to sports and athletics makes a person fit and energetic. There are many students who are weak in academics and does not have a radiant future in the field of academics, but these students are often gifted with skills and talents for a particular activity that makes their future bright. For example, Rahul Dravid, was good at cricket, but he opted for the field of CA and when he failed in it, he rendered to go for cricket. And today, he is among the top cricketers of world. Hence, we can say that going for extra courses give us a chance to evoke the skills beneath us and can be prolific.
There are many benefits for a student in taking variety of courses, but, on the contrary, there are some cons too. A student overshadows his academics while he is penchant for the other courses. And it has a negative impact on the academics of student. Moreover, sometimes a student get over labored to such activities that enervates the students and then they feel lethargic the remaining time. This worsens the student's focus on academics and other routine of life. Meanwhile as there are some reasons opposing the participation in extra courses, but there are plenty reasons to support it.
Summarizing my opinions stated above and based on the fact that taking part in variety of courses elevates a student and enhances their life, I conclude that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 58
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 58
- "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." 50
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas whe 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...dents field of study. I comply with the authors statement because taking part in variou...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...asons, based on which I accede with the authors statement and I will comprehend the rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...alent of a person and can be beneficial in future. Secondly, adhering to extra curricu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...on academics and other routine of life. Meanwhile as there are some reasons opposing the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85924369748 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64119247917 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457983193277 0.4932671777 93% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4725066041 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381508509348 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12583176659 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173866251349 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294224273501 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196667288816 0.0667264976115 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.