Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
In today's competetive and fast-paced world, there is always the daunting question posed in front of univerisities; should universities require students to take courses outside their specialization. I would like to argue that, devoting your time only to a particular field is defenitely better to improve your knowledge in your specialized field, but it is essential for students to take courses apart from these to better integrate and contribute in today's multi-faceted world.
It is very important for a student to develop a well-rounded personality and have a diverse knowledge and expertise. Hence, universities should allow students to accent their curriculum with courses different from their field of study. For instance, if an aspiring surgeon were to only study the nuances of his field and never learn about interactnig with humans and how to deal with grief that comes with the death of loved ones (sociology, psychology), they would never be able to properly interact with future patients considering the situation and sensitivity of the matter. If a physics major were to never learn about the history of science and how the efforts of various brilliant minds over the centuries have shaped the world in which we live today, she/he would never be able to make the subject an interesting one for his own future students.
Furthermore, taking up new courses allows many students to discover new interest and proclivities to different fields and gives them a sense of direction in life and new goals to look forward to. Many who disagree with this school of thought make the argment that this leads to unnecessary confusion and wastage of precious time. However, a wide breadth of knowledge is is always benefitial and in mnay circumstances, students make up their mind and completely change their discipline and can go on to have successful careers in their new chosen field.
I would like to conclude by saying that stuying various courses apart from your chosen discipline builds a foundation for an inter-disciplinary knowledge which is essential in the continuously globalizing world.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 52
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only make our lives more complicated. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rief that comes with the death of loved ones sociology, psychology, they would never...
^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...e. However, a wide breadth of knowledge is is always benefitial and in mnay circumsta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... successful careers in their new chosen field. I would like to conclude by saying...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, well, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21533923304 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96589443339 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3580130476 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.8 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235743360483 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094288969611 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781299916822 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132058593303 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801998933901 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.1392134831 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.