Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The writer of the paragraph proposes that universities have to require students to only take relevant courses to their studies. However, taking different courses will widen the knowledge of the scholars, yet I believe taking the most relevant courses to their demanded fields will conducive to a more auspicious outcome in their studies.
First of all, there are numerous courses which students are indifferent about and participating in those classes will only contribute to wasting their time and money. The Attendance cost of most of the colleges has increased significantly in the recent years and by taking extra irrelevant courses, a considerable amount of investment will be wasted. Besides the cost, these dilatory courses will extend the time of completion of the degree. For example, in engineering fields there isn’t a significant need to know about a nations historical events and they cannot even use it in their careers. By taking such courses they only waste their time and money on what is neither interesting nor helpful to utilize in their future.
In addition, by taking extraneous courses the scholars only perform superciliously in the irrelevant subject just in order to pass the test rather than putting effort in them. On the other hand, by taking their demanded courses they will put all their effort and this will contribute to a better understanding in their studies rather than a perfunctory activity in their progress. Taking psychological fields as an instance, taking math classes will be futile in their careers and they have to put a large fraction of their energy on discerning these courses rather than accomplishing the profound aspects of their preferred courses.
Although taking a variety of courses widens the knowledge of the students in various fields, taking irrelevant fields should not be mandatory and students have to be free to choose what they believe is useful in their studies. Passion in studying has a telling impact in the outcome of their education and taking irrelevant courses will thwart them to put all their love to their education experience.
In conclusion, I believe taking the desired courses increases the effort and passion of the students towards their favorite fields and also prevents the waste of money and time allocated for irrelevant courses. By taking desired courses, predilection will augment the success and efforts of the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | _sejaldangi_ | 83 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Honey for Money | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | actwig | 66 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 66
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 50
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 83
- sop 70
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...apos;t a significant need to know about a nations historical events and they cannot even ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25257731959 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76635010445 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461340206186 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4945136109 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.571428571 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 5.21951772744 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19829145321 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959992234987 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490286312408 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141151763237 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244028804157 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.