University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study.
There is no other time in history like today that the human knowledge is growing explosively and so diverse and yet so deep. A quick reflection on a typical company will show how dramatic it is. A high-tech company nowadays usually comprises management team, and departments of product design, finance, marketing, sales, administration, law, and so on. The product design department comprises various kinds of engineers including project manager, electrical engineers, computer engineers, data scientists, etc. So do other departments. The division of work become so detailed and each should require myriad skills. As our works become more diversified, and the technology become more complex, cooperation also become highly demanded. However, the statement to force every students to take a variety of courses is not convincing. The decision should be left to students to decide.
One of the university primary goals is to teach student to solve problems. From previous example, since the products and the works becomes more varied, to solve problems require multi-dimensional skills, and that is generally impossible for an individual to acquire. Thus, cooperation is given more weight than ever. And how could we cooperate with each others if we barely know their capabilities? Further more, not only the productivity become diverse, but also the product. The trend of industrial is getting closer to customize every product. That means the products will be designed for every single customer in the future. Therefore, it is more and more important for product to meet the needs of humanity.
A good case in point would be Steve Job, the former CEO of company Apple, he learned in inter-disciplinary way, exposed himself to various subjects, from calligraphy to electronic engineering. By combining arts, humanity, and technology, he was able to build the sophisticated product, iphone. Its design is so simple and elegant and easy to use even for the elder and the children. Most of the technology to build iphone have been exist for a long time, so from this perspective, it’s not making any innovation. But iphone took a step further into consideration of its customer where no other companies had done. It is a perfect combination of technology, humanity, and art. As Jobs once said: “You can’t connect the dots looking forward, you can only connect the dots looking backwards. So you have to trust the dots will somehow connect you to the future.”
However, the university should not require students to do so, but left the decision for themselves. Students only take couple years to finish their degree. Is it justified to take out time from the precious period to study subjects that will have no relevance to the career that the students plan to pursue? If someone is studying medicine, will it be justified to force him to study history? It is true that knowledge of history will definitely make him educated as he will aware of historical facts which are essential for being well-informed. Nevertheless, would this knowledge make such a difference to his life that it should be mandatory for him?
It is a well known fact that students have to appear for various tests to prove their capabilities in a particular subject. They are given admissions to various programs of study depending on their performance to such test. Therefore, will all students be able to study all subjects of the university level with equal ease? If a student has more aptitude for Mathematics may not be in a position to study Biology that easily. If he is forced to take a course in Mathematics, it might eventually turn out that he spends more time on Mathematics than Biology which is his main subject. Hence, it is possible that force a student to study not in his main field could be detrimental to him eventually.
To sum up, over time, the works today become much more diversified than usual, cooperation is given more weight, and thus the inter-disciplinary knowledge become more important as well. But forcing a student to take courses outside their field may not help in getting better skill in inter-discipline knowledge, and could even make it worse. Therefore, it is better to leave the right of decision back to students, where they can evaluate if themselves have such time or ability to do so.
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 90
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 60
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 58
- Claim: In any field – business, politics, education, government – those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...he technology to build iphone have been exist for a long time, so from this perspecti...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore, it is better to leave the right of decision back to students, where they ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, of course, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3632.0 2235.4752809 162% => OK
No of words: 713.0 442.535393258 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09396914446 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.16740358842 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94438441608 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 342.0 215.323595506 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479663394109 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1155.6 704.065955056 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 39.0 20.2370786517 193% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 42.1943937497 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1282051282 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2820512821 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94871794872 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222937928719 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559679325021 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808852097342 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114463941074 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454843819343 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.