Viokent politcal organisation should be prohibited in our country. They might create only long term problems.

Essay topics:

Viokent politcal organisation should be prohibited in our country. They might create only long term problems.

A political party that argues for violence is to be prohibited is the core genesis of this statement. Author is totally against violence which is clear from the conclusion and the premises he puts forth.

First, India, known for its peace keeping nature, is a living example of non-violence. Freedom movement was only about non-violence and truth. In such a country use of violence is seen to be setting up of a wrong example for the definition of peace. This might be one of the main reason. When the one who preaches fails to follow, then no one would listen to it-the summary of it. Another strong reason would be that use of non-violence will cause creed and discrimination to grow out within people of different sect. This would pull back the society, for at-least 50 years to the past, making situations from bad to worst. Its only after repeated struggle society is made to believe that violence is not the end of anything.

Second might be the fear of loss. Violence would mostly end up with loss of human and property which would be a man-made disaster. This loss will never be an full stop, rather a comma creating of more such instances.

But the argument might have some validity too, there might be a perspective which might throw out one question. If they want violence, then what’s wrong there. Are people being deprived of their basic rights? If no then are the political parties spreading lies and rumours for their gain and growth?. Only upon serious scrutiny and true analysis one could fall into the main reason for organisations going on for violence as a weapon.

Therefore, Usage of violence, at any cost is never a solution but a starting point to a problem. One suggestion can be if the society is made desperate enough to stop something which the world is not yet seen. That is to be confirmed.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-15 Raahul Kumar 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at violence is not the end of anything. Second might be the fear of loss. Violen...
^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...-made disaster. This loss will never be an full stop, rather a comma creating of m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69565217391 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54550045126 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1079606439 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.0 119.503703932 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04761904762 5.70786347227 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 6.88822355289 218% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146062664495 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050215476939 0.0743258471296 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441839632984 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719418655487 0.128457276422 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424594568241 0.0628817314937 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.3550499002 151% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.197005988 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.5979740519 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.