Nature has bestowed us with the capability that no other specie possesses. Knowledge is a boon to human beings to live a more meaningful life with a purpose. Knowledge is basic platform for the growth and development of humans. Being the most intelligent specie of all, it is obligatory to humans to ensure the right balance of ecosystem for ensuring the harmony between them and other species. So, in my opinion, there are plethora of reasons to goad humans to acquire more and more knowledge.
The preposition here has argued that gaining more knowledge becomes cumbersome at one stage and the whole purpose of wisdom in nullified. He argument seems lacuna to me and need more deep analysis. At first, gaining knowledge may seems arcane to someone but perpetual efforts always pay off at the end. Consider for example, how humans have evolved differently from other species. It was our curiosity and painstaking efforts that made us the most sagacious species on the earth. During evolution our ancestors, hunter gatherers, started to think in a different way. They first started walking on two legs realizing that it is easy to look for a prey and predators all at once. During initial stage, we can imagine how grueling it would have been for them to walk on two than that of two legs. But despite encountering difficulty, Homosapien continued the toilsome task and here we are today, biped, the outcome of that effort. Had they bowed to that complex challenge, we would have never evolved as bipeds.
In addition to that, numerous of studies have proved that our brain is fabricated of the muscle as other parts of the body. Although the muscle strength and cells could be different but all the muscles are governed by the same rules. Biologists have proved that muscle gets stronger if it is used regularly and it weakens if not used or as least used. So, while gaining knowledge one is supposed to use his brain which makes brain stronger and grows at faster level.
Contrary to that one might argue that brain if put under tremendous pressure can rupture and fail. There are limitations to everything in this universe. For instance, if a 10th grade student is taught advance level physics, algorithms, sidereal theories and matrix's, then being above his brains capacity those theories will too complex and esoteric to him. So, the process of gaining knowledge should follow the piecemeal approach and ladder theory.
In conclusion, knowledge is best resource we have and we should utilize our skills to make most of it.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 58
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ors, hunter gatherers, started to think in a different way. They first started walking on two legs...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...er theory. In conclusion, knowledge is best resource we have and we should utilize ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90697674419 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53932190946 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5930292479 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.9166666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150850629471 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421806853169 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817165484404 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752856113026 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662512994306 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.