The author of the argument has posited that governing bodies should have the liberty to take decisions by themselves, neglecting the will of the people whom they are assigned to serve. At first glace the argument might seem convincing as it renders power to government bodies to exercise the authority given to them. But a deeper analysis will depict the lucid picture of the outcomes of this theory.
Undoubtedly, it the sole responsibility of the government official to maintain the law and order situation. But along with that it is also the duty of the public servants to ensure that they listen to hoi polloi and address their problems. Unarguably, its is impossible for find the solution to a problem without actually knowing the problem. And who would be better else than the populace, who themselves are encountering challenges, to describe the problems. In my opinion, perhaps, the government officials should arrange the public meets to get a better glimpse of the public issues and frame the policies accordingly. Consider for example, the pressing issue of deteriorating air quality of the national capital Delhi. Instead of imposing the schemes to ban the use of fire crackers and burning stubble in neighboring states, the government has initiated a scheme to educate people and share their feed with the environmental experts to curb the city pollution. This policy not only got the praise from the populace but it has also made them a part of the initiative itself.
In addition to that, it is the right of the people to give their opinions on the matter related to themselves. Although it a general belief that it is the privilege of the powerful people to speak and the lot of the powerless to listen. The beauty of the democracy is that it obliges the powerful to listen. Consider, for instance, the recent demand of the people to administration for passing the law pertaining to right to information. Though the government was reluctant to pass any such law, but the demonstration by the people forced them to fame a law which oblige populace with the right to information.
On the contrary to that, since a country might have diverse range of population, religion, culture and class, under some circumstances it could be difficult to find consensus. In those cases, it is obligatory of the administrative officers to take decision in the welfare of the populace. Asking for people’s consent at such juncture might exacerbate the problem.
To sum up, it depends on the situation, if would be prudent to seek the advice of the people. So, a piece meal approach will be the better solution to deal with such situation, if any.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 54
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94642857143 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85359363817 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524553571429 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5450954112 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.523809524 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183864348613 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458536908989 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050138522997 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858323125313 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575085335681 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.