We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
I do not agree with the statement that we learn much more from people of shared view than people of opposite view. No one is perfect in the world and we do make mistakes. we need opposing side in order to check and correct what we do before it becomes too late.
At first glance, the statement seems to be valid. truly there is something to be learned from people who we share common views because nobody in the world knows everything. people with less experience, whatever discipline it may be, can learn from people with more experience. Therefore they can fill the gap of knowledge. When the members of discussion have same opinion, it brings more sound cooperation among them at least at the beginning. also discussions among them will run smoothly, promoting congenial exchange of ideas. however being congenial is not always desirable because continuing the course of action without realizing the truth can end in terrible end.
There is great example in the history where people with common goal working together resulted in horrifying end. The leader of early modern china, mao, thought that steel is essential source for the nation to be industrialized. Therefore he insisted that every household in china have their own steel maker and make steel themselves. In order to make steel, people of china started putting every steel-like product, like utensils, into their steel maker. Certainly mao and their people had no idea what they were doing because all steel is not the same grade. Any usable steel is made from skilled people in high tech factory. Some Chinese knew that their effort won't produce good result but nobody spoke out being afraid of alluding opposite view. Yes, people in the china shared common goal, however they did not learn what is the most important: they are doing it wrong way.
Story of <span style="font-size: 20.57px;">Galileo</span> insisting that earth is not the center of the universe is also a great example. although it was heresy at <span style="font-size: 20.57px;">Galileo</span>'s time, we know it as true now. however we would still be thinking that world is flat and the sun rolls around earth, if we did not learn the true from people like Galileo. nobody is perfect in the world therefore we need people to check what we are doing. This is why discussion with people having different view is important. although discussions among opposite views often become fierce, it begets new ideas and lets us realize holes that we did not see. without people with opposite view, our view tends to be biased.
In short, we should not underestimate the value of opposing side. discussion with opposing view engenders new ideas and fill the missing parts from our own view. it also let us check if what we do is truly right and stops us before it is too late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... in the world and we do make mistakes. we need opposing side in order to check an...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Truly
...ance, the statement seems to be valid. truly there is something to be learned from p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... nobody in the world knows everything. people with less experience, whatever discipli...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...earn from people with more experience. Therefore they can fill the gap of knowledge. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... among them at least at the beginning. also discussions among them will run smoothl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: also,
... among them at least at the beginning. also discussions among them will run smoothl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 537, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...promoting congenial exchange of ideas. however being congenial is not always desirable...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 537, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...promoting congenial exchange of ideas. however being congenial is not always desirable...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e for the nation to be industrialized. Therefore he insisted that every household in chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 886, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important: they are doing it wrong way. Story of ^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... the universe is also a great example. although it was heresy at ^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 256, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...os;>Galileos time, we know it as true now. however we would still be thinkin...
^^^^
Line 19, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s time, we know it as true now. however we would still be thinking that world i...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 267, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...s time, we know it as true now. however we would still be thinking that world i...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nobody
...arn the true from people like Galileo. nobody is perfect in the world therefore we ne...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 566, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...le having different view is important. although discussions among opposite views often ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 697, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
... us realize holes that we did not see. without people with opposite view, our view ten...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Discussion
...erestimate the value of opposing side. discussion with opposing view engenders new ideas ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...l the missing parts from our own view. it also let us check if what we do is trul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, at least, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96025104603 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02661539154 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4899507883 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6785714286 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 7.80617977528 243% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390693445232 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110593507733 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121548866094 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24639114141 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910390590024 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.