The assertion that only by questioning accepted wisdom we can advance the understanding of the world is a controversial one. On one hand, questioning accepted wisdom we are able to understand the foundation of that thought or work. On the other hand by questioning it we are doubting the traditional thoughts that are prevailing. However, in the final analysis one should ask questions to widely known norms so that one can get a better understanding of the theory.
Firstly, by going into depth of an existing theory one gets to know the rudimentary principles by which the theory is governed. Now, the maker or the inventor of the theory might have disregarded several theories and would have finally extrapolated a final conclusion to a scientific work. By just accepting it and not going into the core of it one cannot understand it completely-and in this process one tends to asks questions. A Simple example is, a child asking endless queries regarding a well established norm. This helps the child learn basic things and nourishes it for the future. Hence, querying a well established norm helps one to grow and interpret some basic principles.
Secondly, sometimes by inquiring about some know facts one can make new theories. For example, in the IT world everyday new startups are born. All of these startups have one thing in common. They ask a very normal question-”WHY”. They try to break the old traditions and come up with new ones. Artificial Intelligence is one illustration for it. The core of artificial intelligence is to make systems that are capable of replacing humans. This, for me, is a question to the whole huma culture. Why should a human work if computer can replace them. Blockchain is another example for the same. There is no need for a central authority to take part in the transactions going around the world. Hence, one should have doubts about certain believed works and build new theories out of it.
Despite this fact, in certain situations such as the authority of some recognised author or an athlete, one should not cast doubts on the validity of a believed work.
Hence, one can conclude that questioning and getting into the core of a problem can increase our understanding about the world around us.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 16
- New Zealand, located in the southwestern Pacific Ocean, is an island country that geographically comprises of two main landmasses, North Island (Te Ika-a-Māui) and South Island (Te Waipounamu), and several smaller islands. There is evidence that the firs 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... On the other hand by questioning it we are doubting the traditional thoughts that are preva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'ask'.
Suggestion: ask
...letely-and in this process one tends to asks questions. A Simple example is, a child...
^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... can make new theories. For example, in the IT world everyday new startups are born. A...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9501312336 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00978580003 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517060367454 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6497830447 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5833333333 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667770863692 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241863011615 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204466424032 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332805226975 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242846100544 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.