The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt supports the idea that - when the well-being of a society is mightly enhanced when its people question authority. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with this statement. Hereby, I am going to illuminate some pivotal points in defence of my position.
To begin with - it has been noted since the time being that - whenever a person or a group of people is rightfully questioned regarding his or their work and responsibilities, the output has been good. It is because feedback is very important factor of any system. It gives the working people a notion that they have been mentored and under supervision. They can not do whatever they would like to do. As a result, they will not be capricious to their duties as well as they will do their duties more proficiently. That is why when a society's people start to ask its authority questions - the authority will be under pressure to do better works or fulfill their duties properly as devoid of these will result in their downfall. They will take better initiatives and decision from which the society will gain profit. The under-the-radar authority will bound to work for the welfare of their people and will make sure that the people are getting sufficient priviledges from their prerogatives. All of these will result into a better and the well-being of the society. So, it can be said that - the statement provided in the prompt is a good way to enhance the wellfare of a society.
Secondly, the question answering process between the authority and laymen also open up the path for the authority to get the feedback of their works from the mass people. Because of their face off the people of a society can ask their leaders and authority regarding their future plans, their previous due tasks, their own problems and needs and most importantly they can share their views - which is nothing but simple a great way to attach the society with their authority. Because of tsuch open conversations people will likely to be aware of the works and plans and can negotiate with their leaders. In response - the authority will get the ideas of the mass people and because of both of their contribution better result is more plausible to come out. And taking better decision is an eminent sign for a developed society; working for their people dilligently.
However - only asking questions to the authority will make no progress for the betterment of a society unless the questions are properly answered or they got dissolved with getting proper feedback. So it is as important as to make a proper system - not just to ask questions but also to solved their problems associating with their questions. For instance - if a authority arranges a question-answer period for its society every months or every weeks or even they get the problems and questions of the simple people from their sources. But will those be counted if the authority does not take proper steps to solve the problems or even to better the conditions of its people? Obviously a big "NO". Of course, no invigilations will be of any use if none of those get any suitable answers. If doing so, the authority will loose the trust of its people and in return will gain their hatred. That is why it is much more important to - not just to mask an asking seasion but also take into action according to the problems raised in the meeting.
Losing people's trust is nothing but a curse for a society; working on to develope the conditions of its people. So, it must maintain that. In order to maintain that - nothing will be a more effective solution of this issue than to make people question its authority directly and the feedbacks from the society respective of those questions. That is why I will like to conclude here that - it is must for a society let its people ask question to it; but yes also with providing proper feedbacks to them in order to maintain a healthy and developed society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 65
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 67
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...fulfill their duties properly as devoid of any of these will result in their downfall. Th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...orking for their people dilligently. However - only asking questions to the authorit...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...with their questions. For instance - if a authority arranges a question-answer pe...
^
Line 7, column 831, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...nswers. If doing so, the authority will loose the trust of its people and in return w...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: WILL_LIKE_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'would'?
Suggestion: would
...ctive of those questions. That is why I will like to conclude here that - it is must...
^^^^
Line 9, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...intain a healthy and developed society.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, of course, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3271.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 687.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76128093159 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11963717896 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68414657892 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391557496361 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1009.8 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0634531929 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.033333333 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.43333333333 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215071261288 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722220496587 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537982119766 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155182927299 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339266255083 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.