Public criticism of the government is an important aspect of all nations irrespective of democracy or autocracy. When authorities deny to acknowledge public criticism entire governments are dissolved monarchs are toppled and presidents resign within a night. Unequivocally, active and large public criticism is the key to continuous incremental change for public welfare.
Strong Public criticism by many acts as a sword hanging above any government and persuades the government to provide better governance and improve overall conditions. Public criticism acts as a system of checks balances over the government. General perception of the government and feedback of it's policies reaches to the government which then restructures their policies for benefit of the society else it leads to even more criticism. Kalinga, a developed democracy of the east , recently has started using technology positively to conduct various polls for decision making this has given Kalingan leaders highest approval ratings since ever.
When more and more voices are heard, it is easy to pressurize the government to implement policies favoring the public. This acts as a refreshing pill for the democracy and prevents government from practicing unwarranted power. This is cardinal to any government as it prevents dictatorship either by government or by military coup. Miracles can happen when the people start speaking, instances can be drawn from the Arab Spring where decades old dictatorships were toppled by people thanks to social media providing new platforms to raise the communal voice.
Indus a nation in the west on the contrary suffers from the opposite and can serve as an example of what happens when people do not raise their voices against the government policies. Indus's government has imposed the highest taxes of anywhere in the west, government healthcare and food supply has been substituted by more costly private alternatives , gas costs twice as much anywhere ,and free speech is heavily suppressed. All because people decided to mind their own business a few years back and knelt to growing authoritarianism now they face the most dire consequences. Social scientist are already predicting its demise in a decade or so.
One aspect that often defends against excessive public rage is that the fear of public criticism leads to inability of governments to take strong decisions and pass reforms. What we must understand is that the acceptance of any change that is ultimately aimed at bringing good to the society depends upon the ability of government to tout it to the public. Any reform may be challenged at first but with talks and negotiations, they can get acceptance in the public sphere.
We can definitely say that no form of governance has survived without the will of its people; any act of defiance of public speech has toppled of dictator's and removed governments. The same criticism has evolved the public sphere positively in aspects ranging from healthcare to security and economy, provided a feedback to the authorities, maintained social order, forced governments to retract laws and decisions and is a important social marker of the development of a society.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 16
- Progress should be the aim of any great society people too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown 75
- Progress should be the aim of any great society people too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown 16
- The following appeared in an email sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre producti 70
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed our city government promised annual funding to help support it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'deny acknowledging'.
Suggestion: deny acknowledging
...emocracy or autocracy. When authorities deny to acknowledge public criticism entire governments are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...linga, a developed democracy of the east , recently has started using technology p...
^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'leaders the highest'.
Suggestion: leaders the highest
...decision making this has given Kalingan leaders highest approval ratings since ever. When mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uted by more costly private alternatives , gas costs twice as much anywhere ,and f...
^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tives , gas costs twice as much anywhere ,and free speech is heavily suppressed. A...
^^
Line 9, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an get acceptance in the public sphere. We can definitely say that no form of go...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 423, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts to retract laws and decisions and is a important social marker of the developm...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, then, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2695.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33663366337 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93198301463 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542574257426 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3227703448 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821717675298 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274245623907 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220486547617 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463222184037 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169721678643 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.