The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The history of humanity has seen rise and fall of numerous empires and with it, numerous forms of governance and administration. It would be fair to say that each of them had their own pros and cons, and each of them played a significant role in the rise and eventual decline of these kingdoms. They have come in all forms and shapes, from absolutely despotics dictatorships, to limiting governance in family as in monarchy, communist one party governments to democracy. The author states that the well being of the society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. I mostly agree with the his or her statement for the following two reasons.
Firstly, it ensures those who are in power are accountable for their actions. They would need to show their achievements and at the same time explain their lapses. Not only would this prevent corruptions and inefficiencies in the governance, it'd create a drive among the authorities to come up with new and innovative solutions to societies problems as to enhance their image in public. Democracy as a form of goverment is a good example of this plan in action - as a "of the people, by the people, for the people" type of goverment, people have the right to question the authority. In the event that the people in power don't perform upto the expectations of the people, they can easily be replaced in the next election. This provides incentives for the group in authority to constantly innovate ideas for improvement in the society if they wish to stay in power. When people question the authority, it stems venality among those in power. If caught, it can lead to their decline and in many cases permanent loss of trust. The RTI or Right to Information Act in India is a good example of the sample, which enables Indian voters to obtain any financial records of a government organisation or question the activites of any leader in public office in order to know if he or she is actually contributing towards the growth of the soceity.
Secondly, a transparent authority figure where people can know it's actions and question it's decision, breeds trust amont the populace. This leads to a development of an overall positive sentiment in the society where people help and support the intiatives taken the government and as such it can give better results than expected. The high level of trust also helps in more efficient law and order and reduces crimes. Recent examples of this are the stark contrast between the covid vaccination programmes in New Zealand and United States. The overall higher level of trust in government, enables the authorities in New Zealand to complete it's vaccination programmes and lockdowns successfully and eventually helped it contain the damage due to COVID to a minimal amount. In contrast, the relatively low level of trust of populace on the government of US resulted in a considerbale poriton of population opting out of taking the COVID vaccine which is resulting in still rising cases of COVID in some states and an overall much higher losses due to COVID19. Another example would be Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan in India aimed at cleaning of venerated river of Ganga. The intiative received support from the local community and as such the river has been more clean than it has ever been in the past decade.
While I concede that people questioning authority can lead to slower decision making process and thus the authorities can accomplish a little less as opposed to the opposite situation. However, the efficiency brought on by the trust of people can more than make up for any loss of time in decison making process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- Educators should base their assessment of students learning not on students grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas trends and concepts that those facts illustrate 66
- While the Department of Education in the state of Attra suggests that high school students be assigned homework every day the data from a recent statewide survey of high school math and science teachers give us reason to question the usefulness of daily h 60
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 68
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 601, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...question authority. I mostly agree with the his or her statement for the following two ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ood example of this plan in action - as a 'of the people, by the people, for...
^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... In the event that the people in power dont perform upto the expectations of the pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contains'?
Suggestion: contains
...s successfully and eventually helped it contain the damage due to COVID to a minimal am...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...uthorities can accomplish a little less as opposed to the opposite situation. Howe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as for, as to, in contrast, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3006.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87196110211 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75859738875 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500810372771 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4057774324 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7083333333 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195548023 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571160167238 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650989524403 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11426422886 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377583885918 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 601, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...question authority. I mostly agree with the his or her statement for the following two ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ood example of this plan in action - as a 'of the people, by the people, for...
^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... In the event that the people in power dont perform upto the expectations of the pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contains'?
Suggestion: contains
...s successfully and eventually helped it contain the damage due to COVID to a minimal am...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...uthorities can accomplish a little less as opposed to the opposite situation. Howe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as for, as to, in contrast, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3006.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87196110211 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75859738875 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500810372771 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4057774324 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7083333333 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195548023 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571160167238 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650989524403 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11426422886 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377583885918 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.