Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
There has always been controversy about what type of curriculum should be given in schools and whether or not it should be universal. Many states even have their own laws on what can, cannot, and must be taught in their respective schools. Not to mention private schools, which may follow a unique cirriculum unlike the majority of schools. The question at hand is if some students are at a disadvantage due to not learning what another school may teach. It is definitely important that students recieve a well rounded education. What may prevent it from being universal is the fact that students learn at different paces and have many different intrests. It would be impossible to make a cirriculum ubiquitous throughout a nation without harming the learning of students due to factors such as learning curves and intrests. Having a universal cirriculum can be detrimental to students due to the different paces at which students learn. While one student may be advanced in one area, they may be weak in another. This is why there are schools that specialize in different subjects. There is also the example of learning through means of visuals, auditory, and physical touch. While one student may have a really tough time learning through direct communication, they may excellently through visual means. So on and so forth. There are hundreds of combinations of cirriculums and learning styles that can be optimal for certain students and deterimental for others. The objective is to find what works for each and every individual. With flexibility within a cirriculum, teachers can help students adapt and meet their learning needs. Another issue with a universal cirriculum is that it will be far more difficult for students to explore their intrests/talents and find their niche. Being bound to a generalized education system with no option for individual choice can most definitely lead to students that miss out on what they really want to do. Take this example, not going too in depth into the cirriculum, if it required students to complete no more and no less than 6 hours of math, 6 hours of english, 4 hours of history, 4 hours of physical education, 2 hours of art, 2 hours of music, etc. Now we have a student who has a natural talent for art, this student will be limited to that two hours that the cirriculum allows. However, if there was flexibility within the cirriculum this student could potentially find a school that specializes in art and can help them hone in on their talents. One may argue that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum due to many schools having bad student outcomes. While this may seem like a good, quick-fix, while it may help certain students, it will most definitely harm others. Because again, a specialized education tailored to a students needs is absolutely vital to that students potential of sucess. A way to solve this issue of negative student outcomes could be to fix them from the inside. By that I mean professionals from within the government can enter these schools and determine the best course of action to improve the welfare of such students. There are many resolutions available, a generalized one however, would do more harm them good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | Abraham04 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-05-09 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 632, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...dents learn at different paces and have many different intrests. It would be impossible to mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2996, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...be to fix them from the inside. By that I mean professionals from within the gove...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, really, so, well, while, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2696.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91074681239 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76468172099 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466302367942 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3532717663 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8518518519 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.37037037037 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0317318709659 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0116625756015 0.0831039109588 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019586305618 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317318709659 0.150359130593 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.