Being in a holistic approach toward your career and life goals is always important, without letting the magnate of immediate success and fame attract you.
Students right from the beginning of their academic phase should be encouraged to hound behind the long-term and more realistic goals. Because the short-term flukes for e.g. rising to fame just by uploading a video on a social networking is ephemeral and will haunt the young mind and make them crave for more of such short-term fame and successes which is not really a good thing.
The negative side of running behind the flukes can be explained by the following example, suppose a person uploads a video of his skill on social network and gets a million likes and shares owing to this the person gets all pumped up to upload next video and he uploads it again but this time the content is not appreciated, such a lack of appreciation from the audience pose psychological problems to the young person's mind and may lead them into a phase of depression and anxiety.
On contrary, there are some pros of getting this short-term success like, when a person just with the intent of sharing knowledge writes a blog and with the passage of time the blog gets upvoted to become very interesting, such kind of unexpected success encourages the person to do more and more of such content and it leads to spreading of knowledge.
Finally, it doesn't mean people go on behind such a short-term fame rather the young mind should be encouraged to pursue the long-term goals and in the meantime, if they get any unexpected success then that is appreciable but students are not advised to get succumbed to the short-term fame and successes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... spreading of knowledge. Finally, it doesnt mean people go on behind such a short-t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, if, may, really, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81164383562 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58534880226 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537671232877 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 23.0359550562 208% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.811541829 60.3974514979 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 234.166666667 118.986275619 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 48.6666666667 23.4991977007 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212180093428 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117613759064 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637297303425 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124247190109 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728145663177 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 14.1392134831 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.22 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.1743820225 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 11.2143820225 189% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.