Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
The most common thing in successful people is that they never settle with small milestone instead they focus on their long term goals. To accomplish the desired objective one needs to constantly work hard and never settle with immediate fame and recognition. I agree with the author that young people if they want to be successful in their life than they should focus on the long term, realistic goals.
The small fame and recognition sometimes can slow down someone or mislead if one will think that this is his destiny and in this, he/she will forget his main goals for which he/she was working. This can be seen in the TV industry where most of the TV star end up their career after initial fame and recognition. If they continue with their career there is a high chance of them to be even more famous. So, without satisfying with the immediate fame one needs to always give efforts to achieve bigger goals.
Another example is Sachin Tendulkar, an Indian cricket legend who entered in cricket at the age of 18 and played till 38. In his cricketing career if he did not improve his game continuously after some fame and recognition than he would not have been considered a legend of cricket. As today many players stop looking at their game after they perform well in one tournament. The constant improvement with step by step accomplishment of small milestones is the key to get much bigger milestones.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Apple founder Steve Jobs started their company in the United States first, but they did not stop there only after getting success in the US they expanded their businesses all over the world. If they would have stayed only in the US than, would they be in top companies of the world?
Though, small fame and recognition are good for anyone's career but, we should always focus and concentrate our efforts to achieve bigger and realistic goals
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 50
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the acceptedwisdom of the time 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve. 57
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 78
- What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about a 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eer after initial fame and recognition. If they continue with their career there i...
^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had stayed'?
Suggestion: had stayed
... businesses all over the world. If they would have stayed only in the US than, would they be in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75683890578 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40439557075 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.852829943 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.785714286 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192691692686 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697905288485 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722509807327 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109073091626 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804414633393 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.