The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar graph describes the expenditures of fast foods by people grouped according to their income levels. High income group spends more than twice as much on hamburger (43 pence per person per week) than on pizza. However, there is no significant difference between their weekly expenditures of pizza (20%) and fish and chips (16%).
Next, average income people spend moderately greater on hamburger (33%) compared to fish and chips (25%) and pizza (12%). In contrast to higher income group which spends more on fish and chips, expenditures of average income people are more for fish and chips. On the other handlow income groups has lowest expenditure rate for fast foods. They spend more on fish and chips followed by hamburger and pizza.
The line graph shows varying trends in consumption of fast foods in grams from 1970-1990. Consumption of fish and chips has decreased gradually in 70s and 80s with slight increase in 1990. On contrary, consumption of hamburger has increased quickly whereas pizza showed a steady increase.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-11 | friday1004 | 77 | view |
2013-09-17 | narmin.19 | 73 | view |
2013-08-15 | naresh dubaka | 70 | view |
2013-07-27 | fialka | 70 | view |
2013-05-28 | Nilam | 60 | view |
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village. 83
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 85
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 84
Sentence: On the other handlow income groups has lowest expenditure rate for fast foods.
Error: handlow Suggestion: hand low
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 10 8
No. of Words: 169 150
No. of Characters: 830 800
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.606 3.7
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.528 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 20
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 10
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.419 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.451 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.633 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 3