Emigration is a natural consequence of an individual’s desire to improve their lives. Therefore there should be no restrictions on international migration. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Provide examples and supporting evidence to back up your opinion on this subject.
There is no denying the fact that due to globalization, people are frequently migrating to and from, in the want of better life standards. It has ben argues that people should be allowed to move freely. So the argument for unrestricted migration does not seems realistic and valid due to associated snags such as border safety and imbalance in population.
At the outset, it is an admitted fact that now a days people are moving around the globe due to various reasons. It is highly important to assess the qualified applicants prior to allow them to migrate. If their purpose of migration will not be properly monitored, it can cause severe threats to the border safety of any country. Thus, This kind of unnecessary disturbance should be checked at all cost.
In spite of this fact, if international visitors will be allowed to migrate in unrestricted manner, they can carry any sort of illegal drugs and prohibited materials in and out of the country. Not so long ago there were cases where people were running an organized illegal racket for distribution of illegal drugs. Therefore, in order to check these kinds of anomalies and organized crimes, migrants should be restricted to the great extent.
However, there is no harm in allowing the rightful candidates to migrate with right purpose. It can be done provided the perspective candidates are properly interviewed and medically examined. Therefore government should have suitable system in place in order to facilitate deserving candidates.
To summarize, after meticulously assessing the given statement, it can be felt that only deserving people should be allowed to migrate provided if they meet with the country’s interest. Thus it can be deduced that free movement of people across the borders, should be restricted to certain extent for the benefits of the country.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-07-20 | AMIT KUMAR | 70 | view |
- There are no longer enough natural resources to sustain current levels ofeconomic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 70
- Mass Tourism has a negative effect on a country and should be discouraged. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this statement? 63
- Emigration is a natural consequence of an individual s desire to improve their lives Therefore there should be no restrictions on international migration To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Provide examples and supporting evidence 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 301 350
No. of Characters: 1499 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.165 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.98 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.742 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.137 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5