Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?
Give reasons for your answer.
Write at least 250 words.
(Question from: http://www.ielts-exam.net/ielts_writing_samples_task_2/728/)
Freedom of speech is an origins freedom of liberal world. However, many people argue that sometimes we should restrict this right in order to maintain social harmony or state security. This point of view occurred even in free societies. For example, some countries denied people to express favor of Nazi ideologies. This essay describes why I totally refuse this opinion.
There were three main reasons for free societies to not abandon freedom of expression. Firstly, freedom of speech is a pillar of free societies itself because it have made another kind of freedom possible. For example, we hardly to imagine how people can stop authorities to abuse their bodies or properties if the not even have the right to speak that they don’t prefer it. It is not necessary to say that people participation or free election cannot be occurred if people not have the right to critic policies or candidates. We can do all of these only when we have freedom to speak as a precondition.
The following reason, some people may argue that even free societies have laws to protect people from harmful; however, speech is not an action. In other words, even hardest words harm nothing. Therefore, I accept that free societies have the right to stop dangerous action coming from speech, but it not has the right to blind the right to speak. It is undeniable that people have ability to said stupid words but free societies civilize enough to deal with it by neglect, tolerate, or social punishments like banned that people from communities.
For the last reason, worse speech still can give benefits to societies. Like scholar said: the function of bad idea is to make us know what is good idea look like. For instance, when some people speak support Nazi regime, public will turned to critics it and demonstrates why we should not listen to them, and, this will make children know how holocaust was terrible. Moreover, it is not necessary to say that some dangerous words in the past like Christian gospel can turn to be valuable words when the time was past. Thus, why we not leave the speech test its value by time instead of act like roman soldiers who execute Jesus.
All in all, freedom of expression is an important component of free societies. Moreover, we have another ways to deal with bad word in particular let it is experimented its value by time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-21 | Khalsa kaur | 11 | view |
2018-08-29 | max1mus | 61 | view |
2018-07-21 | Khalsa kaur | 82 | view |
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?Give reasons for your answer.Write at least 250 words.(Question from: http://www.ielts-exam.net/ielts_writing_samples_task_2/728/) 68
- The graph illustrates the quantity of chicken, beef, lamb, and fish consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 80
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below.You should write at least 150 wo 63
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40 44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 90
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where re 70
Sentence: Freedom of speech is an origins freedom of liberal world.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to origins and freedom
Sentence: There were three main reasons for free societies to not abandon freedom of expression.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a negator
Suggestion: Refer to to and not
Sentence: For example, we hardly to imagine how people can stop authorities to abuse their bodies or properties if the not even have the right to speak that they don't prefer it.
Description: The fragment we hardly to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace hardly with adjective
Description: The token the is not usually followed by a negator
Suggestion: Refer to the and not
Sentence: It is undeniable that people have ability to said stupid words but free societies civilize enough to deal with it by neglect, tolerate, or social punishments like banned that people from communities.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to to and said
public will turned to critics
public will be turned to critics
why we not leave the speech test its value
why not leave the speech tests its value
Sentence: Moreover, we have another ways to deal with bad word in particular let it is experimented its value by time.
Description: The word let is not usually used as a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to let
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
Read a good grammar book.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 407 350
No. of Characters: 1892 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.492 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.649 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.374 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.381 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.086 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.515 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5