The table and the bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The table and chart show that is percentage of travellers transport in Houston, Texas, commuters average how much using carbon dioxide type of commuter produces.
The most popular people use private car 48 percent of people travelling and 11 percent using people going together by car 11 percent, for train or bus approximately 37 percent, unlike cyclist or pedestrian just 4 percent, therefore cycle
On overage using private car for traveller 43 or 44 old, regarding transport train or bus 47 old, using vehicle with machine oldest than those who walk or cycle, cycle or walk just 37 old.
People commuting drive only and car 1 person more by car to produce carbon dioxide more 0.05 - 0,5 more kilograms per person per kilometer, bus or train just have 0,3 emissions. Therefore using public transportation to produce only a few. Therefore, for user vehicle without machine produce fee polution.
Overall, the most popular form of transportation, car also the one which produce carbon dioxide emissions
- The table and the bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 50
- in the past, most people lived in small villages where every one eles.Nowdays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area.what do you think where the advantages of living in small community? 50
- The diagram below shows the way of producing raw material to make brick manufacturing. 50
commuters average how much using carbon dioxide type of commuter produces.
Description: what is the verb for this sentence?
Error: overage Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Therefore, for user vehicle without machine produce fee polution.
Error: polution Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 817 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.982 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.612 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.351 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.46 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.805 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.128 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4