ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY
We are living in the 21st century where the world is moving forward at lighting speed. Each day there are new inventions or a new and more efficient way of doing the old things. It is impossible to stay away from these developments. Each new development brings with it the positive and the negative.
From the fields as diverse as science to technology to medicine, every field nowadays has something to showcase to the world. One of the fields where the human being has lagged behind over the last few decades is the enhancement in the batteries. Each day we use several devices which are powered by the batteries. From watches to mobile phones to computers and several other personal devices are dependent on these small hidden soldiers within each device. Despite so much of dependency on these little creatures very little has been done to improve their efficiency.
But over the last couple of years a lot of emphasis has been made to make batteries more efficient and capable to hold charge longer which making the charging time much less. With the help of advancements in technology, the scientists have been able to identify the long hidden properties to make the existing materials like lithium etc. more efficient. The improvement has been in terms of both the longevity of operation and reduction of recharge time.
Given our dependency on batteries, this is the one field where I feel the science and technology combined together can bring in tremendous change even to our climate with lesser dependency on fossil fuels and the subsequent reduction in pollution and global warming.
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY 80
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY Preparing for PTE
- AGE DISCRIMINATION OCCOURS WHEN A DECISION IS MADE ON THE BASIS OF A PERSON’S AGE. IN THE WORKPLACE, THESE ARE MOST OFTEN DECISIONS ABOUT BEING EMPLOYED IN THE FIRST PLACE, WINNING PROMOTIONS OR BEING UNFAIRLY DISMISSED. SHOULD DISCRIMINATION AGAINST OL 80
- DO YOU THINK CONSUMER SHOULD AVOID OVER PACKED PRODUCTS OR IT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF PRODUCER TO AVOID EXTRA PACKAGING OF PRODUCTS?” GIVE YOUR VIEWS OR ANY RELEVANT EXAMPLE WITH YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE. 57
- A majority of people say buy Canon, and a few say buy Nikon. What should I buy, I’m confused? 70
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'i feel']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241258741259 0.268076937826 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.116061578633 133% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122377622378 0.0759168565197 161% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041958041958 0.0366838410393 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.027972027972 0.0131127313244 213% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118881118881 0.155750635184 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0559440559441 0.0379272487307 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6330989116 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0454545454545 0.0210936926555 215% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.125874125874 0.0948980150116 133% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0034965034965 0.00437022459523 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174825174825 0.00967000014798 181% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1600.0 1161.00487805 138% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.9 137% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94795539033 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73763899035 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349442379182 0.337110787985 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260223048327 0.247514529752 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189591078067 0.171178102325 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137546468401 0.112407865282 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6330989116 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.546246751206 108% => OK
Word variations: 61.5782195721 49.3433353143 125% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 8.93414634146 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2142857143 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4073193457 42.9750493124 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 135.714022679 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 0.689975730869 41% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 45.236590547 47.7609492067 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.859375 2.94281807926 63% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607470427504 0.418131533498 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102990137498 0.181151798455 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.070765260523 0.0850326197045 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541692738121 0.706616315825 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.207096263347 0.157042692854 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294135768349 0.228904883108 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320626994671 0.108899403657 29% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.355232533122 0.367819155151 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0854842139913 0.0812612215331 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0423511845494 0.316326947829 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203102489817 0.0921553760075 22% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 7.0 Out of 9