The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar graphs elucidate the information about how many people visited New York City through three major airports, from 1995 to 2000.
Initially, about 35 millions of people have visited La Guardia airport when they visited New York. It was the most popular airport in 1995. The next highest travellers recorded as John F, Kennedy airport at almost 30 millions, which is followed closely. The least airport chosen to visit was Newark. Between 1998 and 1999, travellers visiting John F. Kennedy airport dropped to around 32 millions to reach at the lowest points. At the last year, this figure grew slightly to 44 millions. In contrast, La Guardia showed the steady increment until after 1999, it had the most number of visitors of nearly 70 millions as it reached its peak.
It is apparent that, the overall number of foreign travellers travelled to New York through John F. Kennedy airports fluctuated over 5 years while the other two airports increased in the number of visitors. By 2000, the most popular airport was La Guardia.
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the Sun Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram 97
- To borrowing huge personal debts should be made more difficult for individuals because, many people are using credit cards or loans and they may be unable to repay. What are your opinion? 75
- The bar chart indicates a survey on two different age groups on the factors contributing to make their environment pleasant for working The survey was carried out on two groups of workers those aged from 18 30 and those aged 45 60 and shows factors affect 84
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 93
flaws:
Some years are ignored. Like in 1996, 1997
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 174 200
No. of Characters: 836 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.632 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.805 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.348 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.321 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.403 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4