The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the total value of Southland's three major exports in 2000, 2014 and prevision for 2025. The general overview here is that meat products are always surpassed by the rest in the value of exports.

To specify, the value of international tourism has witnessed a gradual rise from 8 billion pounds in 2000 to 8.9 billion pounds in 2014, before a continued climb to 9.9 billion pounds in 2025. In comparison, after a considerable increase from 7 billion pounds in 2000 to the highest point of 9.9 billion pounds in 2014, the revenue of dairy products exported will drop slightly to 9.5 billion pounds in 2025.

On the contrary, the figure of meat products has gone down significantly from 6 billion pounds in 2000 to 5.5 billion pounds in 2025. Interestingly, only in 2025 will the value of international tourism nearly double the value of meat products.

In conclusion, the total value of exports in Southland will follows an upward trend until 2025.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-05-14 Lee Swet Ying 96 view
2018-02-27 moewlien 73 view
Essays by user Donquixote_92 :

Comments

will follows an upward trend until 2025
will follow an upward trend until 2025

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 789 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.753 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.674 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.851 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.55 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.825 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.278 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4