The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the in formation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Due to various factors we have faced the fact of degradation. Here based on two illustrated diagram and table we analyzing some effective factors and some degraded land of different parts of world:
According to pie chart main cause of worldwide land degradation is over grazing, which accounts for 35%. The second factor is land’s deforestation by 30%. The third reason, by accounting for 28%is over-cultivation. And the last not least reason by seven percent includes other factors.
The table analysis 3 different countries, North America, Europe and Oceania for how much they are involved in degradation.
Land degradation in Europe is 23% : The main reason is deforestation at 9.8% , then over-cultivation by 7.7% and 5.5%for over grazing.
Eroded land in Oceania is 13% : The first cause at 11.3% is over-grazing and then 1.7% for deforestation.
Land degradation is North America is 5% : 3.3% for over-cultivation, 1.5% for over grazing and 0.2% because of deforestation.
- SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN HOSBITALITY INDUSTRY A study of hotels in Vienna
- Some experts believe that children should learn a foreign language in primary school rather than secondary school. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 70
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 70
- age distribution of the population in Australia in 1961 and 2031 73
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent.Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent. 62
we analyzing some effective factors and
we analyze some effective factors and
flaws:
No. of Words: 157 200
Number of Paragraphs: 6 4
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.7 21.0
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: body 1
para 3: body 2
para 4: conclusion
or
para 1: introduction
para 2: conclusion
para 3: body 1
para 4: body 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 157 200
No. of Characters: 782 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.54 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.981 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.209 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.981 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.408 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.679 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.112 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 4