The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the percentage of varying types of households that lived in poverty in Australia in 1999.
It is noticeable that the sole parents were the poorest group followed by the second poorest category, singles that had no children, while the two groups (aged couple and single aged person) were by far the least deprived types among all groups in 1999. The remaining two categories took up the average proportions compared to the highest and lowest family types.
In 1999, the group, sole parent, made up the most percentage in terms of living in poverty at 21%, which was slightly hig...
- Governments should not have to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him or herself. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 70
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 90
- Governments should not have to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him or herself To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 75
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree? 48
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 200 200
No. of Characters: 978 1000
No. of Different Words: 103 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.761 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.89 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.594 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.173 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.434 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.697 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4