The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives the information about the proportion of people living in poverty from each household type in Australia in 1999.
The proportion of people living in poverty varies according to the household type. It is clear from the table that large proportion of household belonging to sole parent, which is 21%, is living in poverty followed closely by single with no children with 19%. The striking feature of the table is that very few people among the family of the aged couple, single aged person and couple with no children are living in poverty with the proportional share of 4%, 6% and 7% respectively. The family consisting of couple with children matches almost with the national average in this case.
But if we look the total number of people living in poverty, the scenario is quite different. The maximum number of people living in poverty are from single with no children family whereas in the case of minimum is people from aged couple family.
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 70
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes ( in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
But if we look the total number
But if we look at the total number
flaws:
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 165 200
No. of Characters: 777 1000
No. of Different Words: 75 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.584 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.709 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.442 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.91 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.559 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.706 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.287 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4