The table gives information about the share of market for mobile phones in the years 2005-2006 showing the data in percentages.
It is possible to notice that the primacy was reached by Nokia in 2005 with an amount of 32.5 that increased of a percentage of 2.5 in the following year; there are moreover other two examples of rise given by Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
The first one in fact passed from 17.7 to 21.1 % while the second brand of phone, even if the numbers regarding the share of the market are smaller, improved from 6.3 to 7.4%.
For what concerns instead Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and other mobile phones they all registered a fall: the most significant drop is represented by Other brands that started in 2005 with 19.2% and finished in the next year with 16.2% followed by Samsung( from 12.7 to 11.8) LG in which however the amount of sharing differed just a bit from 2005 and finally BenQ mobile with 4.9% in 2005 and 2.4 in 2006.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002. 70
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 67
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the cause of this What solutions can you suggest 47
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 75
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 68
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 757 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.266 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.532 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4