The table gives information about the share of market for mobile phones in the years 2005-2006 showing the data in percentages.
It is possible to notice that the primacy was reached by Nokia in 2005 with an amount of 32.5 that increased of a percentage of 2.5 in the following year; there are moreover other two examples of rise given by Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
The first one in fact passed from 17.7 to 21.1 % while the second brand of phone, even if the numbers regarding the share of the market are smaller, improved from 6.3 to 7.4%.
For what concerns instead Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and other mobile phones they all registered a fall: the most significant drop is represented by Other brands that started in 2005 with 19.2% and finished in the next year with 16.2% followed by Samsung( from 12.7 to 11.8) LG in which however the amount of sharing differed just a bit from 2005 and finally BenQ mobile with 4.9% in 2005 and 2.4 in 2006.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the cause of this What solutions can you suggest 47
- Students should pay the full cost of university studies,rather than have free higher education provided by the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 43
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrolSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 65
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 68
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 757 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.266 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.532 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4