The table gives information about the share of market for mobile phones in the years 2005-2006 showing the data in percentages.
It is possible to notice that the primacy was reached by Nokia in 2005 with an amount of 32.5 that increased of a percentage of 2.5 in the following year; there are moreover other two examples of rise given by Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
The first one in fact passed from 17.7 to 21.1 % while the second brand of phone, even if the numbers regarding the share of the market are smaller, improved from 6.3 to 7.4%.
For what concerns instead Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and other mobile phones they all registered a fall: the most significant drop is represented by Other brands that started in 2005 with 19.2% and finished in the next year with 16.2% followed by Samsung( from 12.7 to 11.8) LG in which however the amount of sharing differed just a bit from 2005 and finally BenQ mobile with 4.9% in 2005 and 2.4 in 2006.
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons f 91
- Global population percentages and distribution of wealth 70
- t is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 43
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxin 77
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 75
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 757 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.266 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.532 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4