The table gives information about the share of market for mobile phones in the years 2005-2006 showing the data in percentages.
It is possible to notice that the primacy was reached by Nokia in 2005 with an amount of 32.5 that increased of a percentage of 2.5 in the following year; there are moreover other two examples of rise given by Motorola and Sony Ericsson.
The first one in fact passed from 17.7 to 21.1 % while the second brand of phone, even if the numbers regarding the share of the market are smaller, improved from 6.3 to 7.4%.
For what concerns instead Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and other mobile phones they all registered a fall: the most significant drop is represented by Other brands that started in 2005 with 19.2% and finished in the next year with 16.2% followed by Samsung( from 12.7 to 11.8) LG in which however the amount of sharing differed just a bit from 2005 and finally BenQ mobile with 4.9% in 2005 and 2.4 in 2006.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 67
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- t is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 43
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature. and make comparison where relevant. 70
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 93
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 757 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.266 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.532 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4