The chart gives information about how global population and wealth is distributed by different regions and it is possible to notice from the beginning the evident difference among North America, Europe and Rich Asia-Pacific against China, other Asians from Pacific, India, Africa, Latin American and Caribbean.
In fact, the first three regions mentioned have a significant global wealth with percentages between almost 33 to approximately 23, due to the fact that the amount of population it is always very low: only Europe reaches the amount of 15%.
On the other side, the regions left suffer of lack of wellness since the population reaches picks of about 23% in the case of China or about 17% in India and in other Asia Pacific.
To conclude, the only relevant exception is represented by Africa and Latin America and Caribbean that, even having low levels of population, they have poor conditions of live which do not allow offering an adequate level of wealth.
- It is generally believed that the internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information. 70
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons f 91
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 75
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for commiting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 77
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 40 21.0 //Don't put one sentence as one paragraph.
Sentence Length SD: 4.062 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 160 200
No. of Characters: 786 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.557 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.912 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.062 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.571 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4