The line chart illustrates the number of goods transported by four different means of transportation between 1974 and 2002. According to the chart, it is obvious that road was the most popular modes during the period.
An upward trend was seen for road, pipelines, and water transportation. Road was the highest mode utilized by people transporting 70 million tonnes of goods which was 30 million tonnes higher than other two closest means, water and railways. By then, the number of goods transferred by road, water, and pipelines rose which ultimately reached 100 million tonnes, 65 million tonnes, and 21 million tonnes in 2002, respectively. Although pipeline figure experienced a decrease, the rise was marginal in comparison with the other two ways.
On the other hand, railways figure continued to fall and touched the lowest point, roughly 25 million tonnes of goods in 1994. The railways figure, however, recovered gradually and back to the initial amount of tonnes in 1974 after 1999.
It is clear that despite downward and upward trends happening among the four means, there were no significant changes on the rank of modes taken by people to transfer goods from one place to another during the period.
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks? 93
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 40
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 70
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999. 70
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York in last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 86
despite downward and upward trends
despite the downward and upward trends
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 199 200
No. of Characters: 987 1000
No. of Different Words: 115 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.756 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.96 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.552 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.724 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.69 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4