Development in Technology and science, has promoted the use of machines. stuff that used to exert a large number of resources now can be easily done, using machines. Although there are many things that still need to be done by hands. Like artistic stuff and inventions.
For repetitive work, machines are often more precise. Especially for producing products in large scales. Using machines will decrease the error as low as possible, specifically in electronic appliances. Using machines is more reasonable for building goods in huge quantities. Moreover, it enhances the productivity. for example, nowadays thousands of cars with high quality can be produced in just a day, or even less.
Creating stuff using hands, somehow calms individuals. Especially in the case of art, like painting, sculpture, embroidery or woodcut. Besides feeling good, using hands is necessary. In other words, for creating stuff, whether it is art or invention, handy work are very much needed.
In my opinion, creating things with hands or building things using machines, are for two different purposes. People use hands for inventions and machines to produce the inventions for the public. I myself have an abundant interest in art, and I always enjoy creating something. Therefore I prefer using my hands instead of working with machines.
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree Parents are the best teachers 83
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your 84
- What are some of the important qualities of a good roommate? Use specific reasons and examples to explain why these qualities are important. 60
- TOEFL essay:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stuff
...ence, has promoted the use of machines. stuff that used to exert a large number of re...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e of machines. stuff that used to exert a large number of resources now can be easily done, using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...now can be easily done, using machines. Although there are many things that still need t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...Moreover, it enhances the productivity. for example, nowadays thousands of cars wit...
^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... and I always enjoy creating something. Therefore I prefer using my hands instead of work...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31904761905 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80341951868 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8982636439 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.0555555556 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6666666667 22.9334400587 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198650325215 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646537954236 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703195910512 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121364257082 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573727144038 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.39 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.