the advantages of living in a big family

Family is an indispensable part of society. Some people believe that having a multigenerational family has both benefits and drawbacks. From my perspective, I agree with this statement for the following reasons.

Living in an extended family, in my opinion, has three major advantages. For the first reason, family members might provide more support to one another. Grandparents, for example, can care for children while their parents are at work. Secondly, each family member has a closer relationship than in a nuclear family. Family relationships are enhanced when different generations live together. Children's behavioral and emotional difficulties are reduced when grandparents are involved in their lives. Grandparents can play a vital role in the lives of children whose parents have split. Living with their children and grandchildren relieves grandparent’s loneliness and enriches their daily lives. Furthermore, households with two or more adult generations are more cost-effective. Utilities, food, maintenance costs, decorating costs, property taxes, homeowners' insurance, and homeowners' association fees are all things that can be shared. Young adults who share expenses have the potential to save money or pay off debt. Young adults can cut debt, enhance their credit, and save for a down buy by temporarily living with their families.

On the other hand, the drawbacks of a big family also need to be considered. The first one is more noise. Adults who are unaccustomed to being around children may need some adjustment time. Household rules can limit loud play by place and time. In addition, When living together, there can be more family tension. Financial disagreements, parenting differences, and household responsibilities are all common sources of friction. Before such issues become problems, rules and procedures for dealing with them should be discussed and resolved.

In conclusion, the advantages of living in a big family appear to be greater than the disadvantages. There may be more family tension but members from a tight relationship can help each other when they have tough problems.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 965.302439024 187% => OK
No of words: 325.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54769230769 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13256459578 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 106.607317073 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 283.868780488 197% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 8.94146341463 268% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7918934672 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.125 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5416666667 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266698185374 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795034962843 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112463477462 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180371864371 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889086688436 0.0819641961636 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 40.7170731707 243% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.