Before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
The first map illustrates the island appearance before its construction whilst the second map demonstrates its look after the construction of several tourist facilities. There are some comparisons will be figured out in the island transformation. Overall, the island has totally changed after the several tourist facilities are built on the aisle.
Regarding to the first map initially, it is the condition before the construction which there is nothing obviously. The island is empty, just several coconut trees exist and surrounded by the sea whose the total length is 200 metres approximately.
Looking at the second map, the transformation can clearly be seen that there are many accommodations and facilities established in the island. The accommodations are divided into two areas which are the lower land in the west side and the higher land in the central part of the isle. In the middle of the accommodations, there is a restaurant in the north side and a reception spot. Those are surrounded by footpath and vehicle track which linked to the pier in the south of the island shown well.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society 73
- Information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries 73
- the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 67
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...t trees exist and surrounded by the sea whose the total length is 200 metres approxim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, regarding, second, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06132788101 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4243621225 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256158763647 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894108712871 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102306056026 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166559650302 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152421342722 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.