The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
The pie charts below gives information about the average household expenditures in a country from 1950 to 2010 and is measured by major categories. The most significant facts to emerge from charts were that, the household expenditure on the housing category decreased, while the percentages of the some category increased on that period.
In 1950, the most popular category was food standing at 34% which becoming the biggest percentage, then it was followed by housing at 22%, moreover there is the third at 19.2% was the other category, furthermore transportation got 14%, next is education at 6.3%, the final percentage is healthy care only at 4.5% was the smallest of percentage.
On the other hand, in 2010, has drastic difference which housing is the biggest of percentage stood at 72.1%, then followed by food at 11.2% which experience decrease, the same of education, the other, transportation, and healthy care which experience the decrease percentage only 6.6%, 4.4%, 3.3%, and 2.4%. All of category on the household expenditure was measured by percentages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the three different diets 67
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. 56
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- The pie charts below sahow the comparison of differnet kinds of energy production of france in two years 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...decreased, while the percentages of the some category increased on that period. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28070175439 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98205478322 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.712263404 43.030603864 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.6 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 5.23603664747 260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219066156174 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165073837567 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168896144926 0.0843802449381 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165697213021 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148938591273 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.