The average prices per kilometer of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below.
The bar chart illustrates the average costs per kilometer of six nations (Argentina, Brazil, Japan, China, India, Bangladesh) importing clothes into European Union in 1993 and 2003.
Overall, the clothing price of China, India, and Bangladesh in 2003 was greater than its in 1993 while its of Argentina and Japan in 2003 was smaller than its in 1993. Furthermore, the expense in clothes import of Argentina was the biggest while the opposite was true for Bangladesh.
In 1993, it was obvious that fee of Argentina reached a peak of 28 pounds. After that, it showed a slight decrease to 26 pounds in 2003. Furthermore, the cost of Japan in 1993 was exactly 15 pounds which was 2 pounds more than its in 2003. Especially, the expense of importing clothes of Brazil was as same as in both 1993 and 2003.
It could be seen that the importing clothes price in China, India, and Bangladesh had an up-ward trend over a period of 10 years. Typically, the cost of China was just 10 pounds in 1993 and it grown steadily to 17 pounds that was 1.7 times bigger than its in 2003. Having said that the cost of Bangladesh was the lowest number as it showed just about 3 pounds in 1993 and 11 pounds in 2003.
- The average prices per kilometer of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The average prices per kilometer of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 67
- The chart below shows the type of transport young people in four countries prefer to use 61
- The chart below shows Morocco s income from different economic sectors in 2003 as well as its income from fishing from 1982 to 2003 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the opposite was true for Bangladesh. In 1993, it was obvious that fee of Arge...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53703703704 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41714554642 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476851851852 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241246984655 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117955515746 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124176072814 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205509929363 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153151525838 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.