Bài 3: Car maker’s total sales
The graph illutrates the proportion of car maker’s total sales in North America, South America, Europe and Asia over a 4 - year period, starting in 2006. Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of car sales in Asia and North America, as opposed to the data for Europe and South America. In addition, the North Ameria registered the lowest figures throughout the given period, which bottomed in 2009.
In 2006, starting at 30%, a sharp ascent of 20% to reach 50% in 2010 was seen in the amount of money collected from car manufacturers in Asia. Likewise, the data for North America exhibited a two-fold descent to hit 5% in 2009, before recovering to 11% in 2010.
In the first year of the given period, the percentage of car producer’s total sales in European, standing at 30%, grew slightly to reach 38% in 2008, before falling to 30% in 2010. Like, the figure for South America experienced a marginal decline from 30% to 21% between 2006 and 2007. The data in turn reached a plateau untill 2009, before dipping to hit 9% in 2010.
- The table shows expenditures of 4 car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 73
- people communication 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different nations in 2002. 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.https://www.ielts-mentor.com/writing-sam 11
- Writing task1 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72043010753 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6055679859 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0641976397 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230585882205 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983442474625 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13007197562 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151889800815 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904193465364 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.