The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia Australia in 2010.
The bar chart given compares four different nations, namely China, USA, Russia, and Australia, in terms of the purpose of utilizing water in 2010.
Overall, the amount of water was used the most popular in agricultural in four countries whereas there was an opposite tendency with utilizing this to the domestic aim.
As can be seen from the chart, 45% the number of people who used the amount of water in the industry, this figure for Russia was lower than by 15%. By contrast, the water used of Russian saw a lower than American in the agricultural, 30% and 39%, respectively. There was the same pattern as the purpose's domestic. 10% with Russia and 19% with the USA, respectively.
Looking at the chart in more detail, China used the amount of water the most in the agricultural, accounting for 85% while this figure for Australia made up insignificant of 35%. Similarly, most of the water the Chinese used in the industry more than the Australian, accounting for 7% and 3% respectively. Domestic, conversely, was the least popular use in China, just under 10% compared to more than 60% Australian used water in aim's domestic.
- THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WHO OWN THE DEVICES FROM 2010 TO 2025 92
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below. 73
- “Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?” 61
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, look, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85051546392 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7413813387 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520618556701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1039512955 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29712140704 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128121280125 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975672670807 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199278935559 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111109364773 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.