The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart below illustrates five different industries’ percentage share of Brazil’s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

This bar chart gives information about the percentage of Brazil’s economy in the industry in 2009 and 2019. It is also figure projections for 2029 in addition, finance will become the dominant three years of the industry, although oil, coal, and gas will remain strong.
Looking at the bar chart more closely we can see that, the proportion of finance was the highest of the three industries account for approximately 30 percent in 2009 then increased slightly to 35 percent in 2009, this figure will continue to grow up gradually around 40 percent in 2029. Followed by the rates of oil, coal, and gas there was a significant fluctuation between three years. In 2009 the proportion was about 25 percent then rose steadily to about 30 percent in 2019 and then will drop back to the first figure of approximately 25 percent in 2029. Furthermore, the percentage of tourism made up about 25 percent in 2009 then there has a downtrend from 25 percent to 20 percent, it is also will remain stable at 20 percent in 2029.
In the subsequent, the proportion of manufacturing accounted for 20 percent in 2009 then steadily decreased to about 15 percent in 2019 and will drop sharply to approximately 5 percent in 2029. Lastly, the rates of food processing double increased from 10 percent in 2009 to 20 percent in 2019 and it will drop again and return to the first figure of around 10 percent.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-24 minhhh123 70 view
2023-05-23 huynh truc mai 67 view
2022-06-01 Elena Phan 81 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'figured'.
Suggestion: figured
...e industry in 2009 and 2019. It is also figure projections for 2029 in addition, finan...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, so, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72427983539 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71186234192 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43621399177 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4098247048 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130729455729 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901554053694 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10239247768 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126430725344 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696723932325 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.