The bar chart below illustrates five different industries' percentage share of Brazil's economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029
The bar chart presents the proportion of five different industry shares in the economy of Brazil from 2009 to 2019 and a prediction in 2029. Overall, while finance witnessed the gradual increase from 2009 and also in the forecast for 2029, the opposite was true for manufacturing.
In 2009, finance shared over 30% of the economy of Brazil, this percentage increased slightly to 36% after 10 years and is predicted to rise around 40% in 2029. The proportion of tourism share accounted for over 25% in 2009 before falling to 20% in 2019 and is expected to remain unchanged in the next 10 years. Oil, gas and coal share over 25% among 5 industries, this figure is anticipated to remain stable in 2029 after rising to around 30% in 2019.
In terms of food processing, the highest proportion of food processing share belonged to 2019 with around 20%. This percentage was twice as much as that in 2009 and a forecast for 2029. Brazil's economy experienced a decrease in the proportion of manufacturing share, from 20% in 2009 to over 15% in 2019 and is predicted to continue to fall to just 5% in 2029.
- The table below gives information about changes in models of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- With students returning to schools coinciding with the beginning of the rainy season in central Vietnam people have suggested that it might be convenient to continue studying online until the rainy season has finished Discuss the advantages and disadvanta 73
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66232387996 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1051434458 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44130182244 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210959406002 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131264156875 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325807143433 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105011059125 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.