The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029

The histogram highlights information about the amount of percentage which is shared by five industries of Brazil’s economy over a decade from 2009 to 2019 with a forecast for 2029.

Overall, what stands out from the bar chart is that finance was three times as popular as oil, coal and gas. On the whole, food processing manufacturing is not as high a percentage as industry items like tourism.

Looking at the details, Finance headed the list with just under 35 % given to it 2009, but researchers will give it around 41% in the future 2029 while oil, coal and gas came next at around 26% and just under 30% during 2009 and 2019. Although, this was much less popular than a forecast for 2029.

By contrast, food processing was a significant rose to 20% in 2009, but manufacturing went down marginally during three years with a forecast from 20% to 5 %. Tourism was ranked third with around 25 %. After that, despite falling sharply to just over 20% in 2009, the figure then levelled off in the next years in 2019 and 2019.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2009 to 2019 with a forecast for 2029. Overall, what stands out from the bar ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage as industry items like tourism. Looking at the details, Finance headed t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less popular than a forecast for 2029. By contrast, food processing was a sign...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, third, while, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68131868132 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48464091319 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9733785279 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335367524107 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135767187264 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128422252202 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214465104057 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148449545889 0.0819641961636 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2009 to 2019 with a forecast for 2029. Overall, what stands out from the bar ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage as industry items like tourism. Looking at the details, Finance headed t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less popular than a forecast for 2029. By contrast, food processing was a sign...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, third, while, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68131868132 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48464091319 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9733785279 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335367524107 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135767187264 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128422252202 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214465104057 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148449545889 0.0819641961636 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.