The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in someland in 1990.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in someland in 1990.

The designated histogram clearly depicts the information about the numbers of deaths caused by six diseases in someland in 1990, and the amount of experimentation financing allotted to each of these diseases.
Overall it can be seen that the amount of experimentation financing in many cases did not correlate with the seriousness of diseases in term number of deaths.
As it is presented that, the amount of experimentation financing allowed to AIDS was just around 170 million in 1990 in someland,and deaths caused by the AIDS was 0.3 observed from the chart . In addition to this, the same amount of financing allowed for leprosy and tropical diseases had been detected 70 million, and 0.1 loss their life due to leprosy and 0.4 due to tropical diseases.
To following this, the similar trend could be observed in the case of diarrhea which exactly financing funding was observed 50 and 60 million respectively and we're responsible for 0.5 and 0.3 million deaths in someland . Apart from, this the small amount of financing allowed to TB was 20 million ,and the deaths caused noticeably higher.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-27 Komajeet kaur 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...t around 170 million in 1990 in someland,and deaths caused by the AIDS was 0.3 obser...
^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the AIDS was 0.3 observed from the chart . In addition to this, the same amount of...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... detected 70 million, and 0.1 loss their life due to leprosy and 0.4 due to tropi...
^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. To following this, the similar trend could be observed in the case of diarrhe...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rhea which exactly financing funding was observed 50 and 60 million respectively ...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r 0.5 and 0.3 million deaths in someland . Apart from, this the small amount of fi...
^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f financing allowed to TB was 20 million ,and the deaths caused noticeably higher...
^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ancing allowed to TB was 20 million ,and the deaths caused noticeably higher. ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the deaths caused noticeably higher.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, apart from, in addition, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04945054945 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88413933229 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.6814872166 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180555037879 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963687333541 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474672491676 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113943574918 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546824567133 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.