The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organizations.
The given bar chart illustrates the expenditure spent on four different categories by some organizations, measured in euros.
Overall, organization B invested most of money in staff training, while it was building which organizations A, D, and E allocated much. Moreover, machinery and research shared the first place in the amount of money organization C spent on.
Specifically, organizations A, D, and E spent most of the money on building, at 1.5 billion euros in organization A and ! billion euros in organizations D and E. However, the lowest expenditure in organization A was for machinery, while it was research in the two others.
Staff training was invested the highest amount of money in organization B, at 1.9 billion euros, while the allocation of machinery in this organization was the lowest, at 0.9 billion euros. Moreover, organization C spent the largest amount of money on both machinery and research, followed by building, which was invested as much as that in organization D. The lowest figure belonged to how much money staff training was allocated, at 0.8 billion euros.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | llkngocc | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Vanya Sharma | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | Chang_highlight | 87 | view |
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organizations 67
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below compare two floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 100
- The maps below show the organization of a bookstore in 2000 and now 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Billion
...5 billion euros in organization A and ! billion euros in organizations D and E. However...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...5 billion euros in organization A and ! billion euros in organizations D and E. However...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19209039548 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26371616438 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4123283919 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248978680235 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131376986346 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559994907948 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167162069486 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365415307123 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.